Sneaky Ways to Disable/Destroy a Security Camera

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Captcha Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-01 (Thu) 22:09:24 No.13127

>>13123
I can come up with 101 technical ways to neutralize a camera discretely, but that might not be the correct approach, because that's just starting an arms-race.

Maybe the better way to go about this, is putting a performance in front of the camera that makes the guy who put it up, conclude that the camera was a mistake.

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-01 (Thu) 22:36:11 No.13128

High powered laser pointer?

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-01 (Thu) 22:47:31 No.13129

>>13128
caliber?

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-01 (Thu) 22:50:34 No.13130

>>13129
Idk I'm sure there are forums where things of that nature are discussed however

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-01 (Thu) 23:23:11 No.13131

>>13130
>forums
whereabout?

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-01 (Thu) 23:32:36 No.13132

>>13131
I don't know of my specifically but start with 4chan /k/ and its archives I guess

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-02 (Fri) 01:06:15 No.13133

Epoxy, a mask and other basic opsec practices.

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-02 (Fri) 13:36:52 No.13135

>>13133
>basic opsec practices.
?

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-02 (Fri) 20:24:19 No.13136

>>13128
I'm not sure but a laser powerful enough to damage a camera CCD would be a real danger to everyone on the street. Seems like a bad idea.

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-02 (Fri) 22:19:52 No.13138

>>13136
Not really, lasers are shitty weapons, it's really hard to aim for something as small as eyeballs. In the real world it was lab-techs that forgot to wear safety goggles, that got their retinas singed. That got fixed by bugging people until they wore the protection-gear.

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-02 (Fri) 22:52:42 No.13139

>>13138
You don't need to aim directly for the eyes with a really powerful laser. The act of simply viewing its reflection or mark on objects can be enough to cause permanent damage to vision.

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-02 (Fri) 23:32:43 No.13140

>>13139
Doesn't matter, nobody picks that as a weapon because other simpler weapons are more effective.

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-07 (Wed) 02:53:06 No.13154

>>13138
>lasers are shitty weapons
its a shame

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-07 (Wed) 21:44:46 No.13155

Share your tips

>>

Anonymous 2024-08-08 (Thu) 02:32:02 No.13156

>>13154
Science fiction unfortunately created the expectation of high-powered lasers as some kind of weapons, when it should have depicted lasers as the equivalent of a power-drill where the drill-bit never dulls and always extends as deep into the hole as you need it too.

>>

Anonymous 2024-09-15 (Sun) 15:24:35 No.13201

China employs lasers in the South China Sea though so they can be violent but not be at war

>>

Anonymous 2024-09-15 (Sun) 16:49:54 No.13203

File: 1726418993878.webm ( 150.23 KB , 640x360 , laser-beam-sharks.webm )

>>13201
>China employs lasers in the South China Sea though so they can be violent but not be at war
And what are they lasering with that ?

>>

Anonymous 2024-09-16 (Mon) 04:56:45 No.13204

Other countries' coast guards potentially blinding them, blockading them too but hey not at war

>>

Anonymous 2024-09-16 (Mon) 16:29:13 No.13207

>>13204
So dazzling lasers ?
I thought that was pointless because of the technology that automatically dims welding goggles effectively neutralizes that.